October 26, 2006
BITTERSWEET
I don't clean up my blog email inbox very often, so I have lots of old emails spanning my blogging career. But just now I found one tucked away in a folder that was from three years ago this weekend. One that starts...
Interesting post. I am retired AF, former helicopter crew chief/flightmechanic/gunner who got an engineering degree then returned to the flightline as an aircraft maintenance officer.
My first contact with Bunker.
I feel his absence all the time. It's bittersweet for me to travel to Texas this weekend, because we had planned to someday meet. I know that if he were still alive, I would've gotten to meet him this weekend.
I'll still go meet him someday, just not the way I pictured it.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
BAD TIMING
Darned Cardinals and their darned seven-game NLCS series and their darned rain delays. Now I've got a major dilemma on my hands.
This weekend I'll be at the SpouseBUZZ conference at Fort Hood. I'm very excited about participating in this panel, and I know it will be fun to meet fellow bloggers and hear their stories. But I also know that half my mind will be focused on the darned World Series.
Of course, that's not as bad as my friend from college, who had a wedding to attend last Saturday. She spent most of the reception with her face pressed against the reception hall window, trying to see the TV in the bar across the street! She says it should be illegal for people to get married during the World Series or March Madness.
I'd love for the Cardinals to just go ahead and win the thing, but I can't stand the thought of them winning the World Series while I'm 1000 miles away from my favorite Cards fan.
Anyway, if you're in the Fort Hood area and would like to say hi, I'll be at the SpouseBUZZ conference on Saturday. Should be a fun time. And let's pray for torrents of rain so the rest of the series gets postponed until next week.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:50 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was going to go to the SpouseBuzz conference this Saturday, but my babysitter bailed on me. Hopefully y'all will have a good turn out since so many people are in the same situation as me with both 4th ID and 1st CAV deployed. I'm bummed, but maybe next time...
Posted by: Curly at October 27, 2006 02:18 AM (kQWmi)
2
Curly, please check out the SpouseBUZZ blog. I liveblogged the conference, so you can get all the info!
Posted by: Sarah at October 28, 2006 11:40 AM (akwIr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CHAIN OF THOUGHTS
I was thinking more this morning about
my post from yesterday. CaliValleyGirl and I may have grown up in wildly different zip codes, but I can't think of any values she and I don't have in common. Conversely, I know of several lefties who lived their whole lives in rural Missouri. I guess I'm no closer to figuring out what makes us embrace the politics we do.
And then thinking of California made me think of Tupac. Which made me think of my absolute favorite Dave Chappelle skit, one that makes me laugh even harder than Rick James. Maybe it's because I once dated a guy who was really into Tupac conspiracy theories. Yeah, I know, leave me alone.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Definately the best Chappelle skit ever:
"I wrote this song a long time ago
It was the dopest song I ever wrote in '94.
Now what can a brother do
When half the people voted for George W
It's a Bitch
George W...
Can't be true
I'm gonna choke him
'Cuz he's a snitch
I'm talkin' bout George W Smith
From City Council, he ran in '93
Out in Oakland
You probably didn't hear about him.
I wrote this song a LONG time AGO.."
Posted by: Will at October 26, 2006 12:08 PM (QRBGL)
2
ps - I thought chappelle depressed you.
Posted by: Will at October 26, 2006 01:19 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2006
FISHBOWL
CaliValleyGirl is back in L.A. after living nine years in Germany. And she just took a trip to another planet: Alabama. You must go
read her post before you keep reading mine. Go on, git.
I went to college in rural Missouri, population 17,000. Interestingly enough, we had a pretty big foreign exchange community. And I had this exact conversation with a French exchange student. He was dismayed that our town in Missouri never showed any foreign films in the local movie theater, because the locals would benefit from learning about other countries. Our local movie theater had three screens. Three. I tried to explain to him that his idea was not a very sound business move for a rural movie theater, but he insisted that everyone in France is educated about the United States, so we should educate ourselves about France.
I asked him why he didn't study abroad in Finland. He got a little puzzled and said that he didn't really know anything about Finland. Well, don't they have a culture that's worth learning about? Why wasn't he interested in learning about Finland? If he wants rural Missourians to learn all about France, then shouldn't he spend some time learning about Finland? Of course it's a silly juxtaposition, but it made the point that Finland is out of his experience. Learning about Finland might be interesting in and of itself, but it does nothing to really affect his daily life or his future. He was in the US to learn English in order to hopefully get ahead in the business world. What would it help him to learn about Finland, or a rural Missourian to see a French film? Not much in a practical sense.
Everyone wants others to know about and respect his culture. It's his, right? So it must be worth learning about! But "middle America" -- Jesusland, Flyover Country, Red States, or whatever you want to call us -- are really out of the average Californian or New Yorker's experience. I can't really fault them for not knowing about us, any more than I can fault a Frenchie for not knowing about Finland, but we do make up a big freakin' chunk of the country.
I have never been to California or NYC. (Before my mom interjects, I disclose that I went to NYC as an infant, but that hardly counts for my point here.) All I know about L.A. and New York comes from TV, the same way Europeans learn about the US. The disconnect is that my entire US experience, the America that I know, comes from living in Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, and South Carolina. That's the US I know, and it's quite different from CaliValleyGirl's US (living in Hawaii and California).
I'm happy she visited my version of the US. I'd like to visit her version someday too. I think it can help us establish common ground, which would be good for all 300 billion of us.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 499 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Several years ago we took a trip up Hwy 1 in California, Oregon and Washington. Most the time while we were in California, until we reached extreme Northern California, my husband kept saying, "I feel like I'm in a foreign country". I just recognized we were in California, and I didn't realize how much discomfort he was feeling about it until we reached extreme N Calif and he told me how relaxed he was and felt he was back in the USA. I get the same feeling when in Boulder, CO. We've lived on the East Coast in a couple of different areas, and several on the Gulf Coast all of course, in the South.
Posted by: Ruth H at October 25, 2006 07:37 AM (Y77sF)
2
million... 300 million...
Posted by: Will at October 25, 2006 10:56 AM (QRBGL)
3
Whoops. What is this, China?
Posted by: Sarah at October 25, 2006 04:20 PM (7Wklx)
4
You and I have sooooo much common ground, Sarah...but my boyfriend and I also always make a big deal of the little differences. For example, before saying goodbye to me in Germany, my bf sat me in front of the computer and made me read some personal safety website about how to identify and avoid dangerous situations...I think he would feel best if I had and carried a gun. I think he really thinks that I would need it 24/7 here in LA. Anyhoo, America is great...loving every minute being back home!
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at October 25, 2006 09:32 PM (deur4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2006
ON TO GAME 4
Woohoo, the voodoo doll worked!
Go Cards!
Posted by: Sarah at
06:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
WHY VOTING MATTERS
Bleak House: Republicans deserve to lose, but what happens if Democrats win?
First, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has promised that election of a Democratic House would insure "a rollback of the [Bush] tax cuts." Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, who would be chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, would make sure no tax cut extension bill would ever get to the floor. He voted against the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts and the bill that later extended the tax cuts until 2010 (as did all but seven of the 205 Democratic House members). In September Mr. Rangel said that he "cannot think of one" Bush tax cut he would agree to renew.
Investors Business Daily recently pointed out that since the Bush tax cuts took effect in 2003, "the economy has added $1.26 trillion in real output, $14.4 trillion in net wealth and 5.8 million new jobs." But that progress doesn't seem to matter to the liberals, whose primary goal is to raise income tax rates. "Taxing the rich" will be the leading economic argument of a 2007 Democratic House, and a rollback tax bill of some kind will reach the floor.
Second, President Bush will not be able to re-energize his effort for individually owned Social Security accounts, for "preventing the privatization of social security" is in the Democratic National Committee's "6-Point Plan for 2006." Democrats don't trust people to own or invest their own retirement funds--better to let a wise government do that, for as socialist Noam Chomsky says, "putting people in charge of their own assets breaks down the solidarity that comes from doing something together." And since Congress gets to spend Social Security tax receipts that aren't needed to pay benefits, letting people invest their payments in their own retirement accounts would be a costly revenue reduction that the new, bigger-spending Congress won't allow to happen.
Via Instapundit. Yikes. Read the remaining points. Double yikes.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 327 words, total size 2 kb.
1
But reflect on this: the very people saying these things are confident that they're going to sweep into power and sweep the Republicans out. Why? How can they be so sure that there are enough lunatics out there to accomplish that miracle? Mark Foley?
(By the way, your anti-whatever filter keeps rejecting my E-mail address and URL because it ends with dot-info. What on Earth is wrong with dot-info domains?)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at October 24, 2006 12:41 PM (PzL/5)
2
Unfortunately, I share a whatever-filter with about a hundred other mu.nu bloggers, so whatever one filters, we all filter. Sorry. But no worries, I know who you are!
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 04:58 PM (7Wklx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
JUJU
Well, I didn't make it to the store or the post office or anything else I was going to do yesterday, but I did finish knitting a Detroit voodoo doll all in one day.

Heh. Go Cardinals!
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
so whaT'S THE PUNCTURING WEAPON, HERE?...A KNITTING NEEDLE????lol....
Posted by: debey at October 24, 2006 02:57 PM (li+W/)
2
I do think the "dirtgate" thing is being waaaaaaaay overplayed by the media. I played high school baseball and even then it was pretty much common knowledge that on those bitter cold early April days the pitchers were likely to be "loading" the ball. I for one took comfort in that fact as the idea of facing a guy with an eighty-eight mile an hour fast ball with no control frankly scared the crap out of me.
My theory on why LaRussa wasn't more adamant about the umps inspecting Rogers is because he knows Leyland could do the same to his pitchers. Now I happen to be a serious fan of both of these managers, and to me the way LaRussa handled it is exactly the way WE ALL should be handling it.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at October 24, 2006 03:13 PM (8ruhu)
3
Bubba -- We're currently watching Game 3 with a Detroit fan, and though there's lots of ribbing back and forth about "dirt", I'm not really worried about it.
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 04:59 PM (7Wklx)
4
that would make a scary looking christmas tree ornament!
Posted by: annika at October 24, 2006 06:01 PM (qQD4Q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 23, 2006
SAD
I wrote
before about how much I love the stained glass window in the chapel on our old post. Now, according to my old neighbor, they're getting rid of it and designing a new one. I hope they keep the old one intact and put it somewhere else. For whatever reason, that window touches my heart in a way I can't describe.

Posted by: Sarah at
06:22 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow! It was bittersweet to see this post again. I never wrote you when you originally posted this, though I read it at the time, but that post/photo was from the service of my husband's cousin's (we call her "Bim") son, Martin Kondor. Our daughter, too, was posted in Germany & went to Iraq from there. That's how I found you, through Tim & Capt. Patty. Our Sarah was part of 1AD.
Some days the world seems so big, and on others it seems so small. Thanks for reminding me how blessed I am, my daughter came home safely. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: beckie at October 23, 2006 01:02 PM (GIL7z)
2
P.S.
If you still have any contacts there that could follow-up on this & find out if there are plans to preserve the windows, or, if not, if there is any way we could start a fund to "buy" the windows & then find another appropriate place on base to put them, I'd be honored to contribute. Or maybe a more contemporary church off base that would host them? I know the church we attended near my daughter's base in Wackernheim ministered to many, many military families & would have welcomed such a "gift."
Posted by: beckie at October 23, 2006 01:46 PM (GIL7z)
3
Wow. I always loved that stained glass window. Sadly, I was usually only in the chapel for memorial services, which made the window that much more poignant. I agree with you; I hope they find an appropriate place to display it.
Posted by: Robin at October 23, 2006 04:49 PM (6G8cC)
4
Beckie, I will do my best to have some people look into it. A friend emailed yesterday and said that the reason they're removing the windows is completely asinine, in my opinion. Someone complained that there's a "subliminal cow" in the pattern of the stained glass, so the window has to go. Of all the ridiculous... I'll see if I can find out what they're doing with the old window, but if this is the case, there may not be much hope for salvaging the window.
I'm so sorry about your family's loss. And I'm glad your Sarah is home safe.
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 09:26 AM (7Wklx)
5
subliminal COW? Any way of emailing me a better photo of that window? That is a wild issue!
Posted by: beckie at October 24, 2006 01:29 PM (GIL7z)
6
A subliminal COW? Are you kidding me?? Some people will find any possible reason to complain.
Posted by: Robin at October 24, 2006 05:56 PM (6G8cC)
7
The story has it that the artist who orginally designed the mural was Hindu. And the cow or ox is a sacred animal. I will see what I can find out before we go.
Posted by: Jennifer at October 24, 2006 09:05 PM (oLbnP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
PUPDATE
I was asked for a pupdate, which is something I will always oblige. So here the stinker is, cute as can be, snuggled up with his squeeky toy. And it's a good thing he's cute, because yesterday he ate through the apartment mini-blinds like they were made of ham.

Posted by: Sarah at
06:06 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think it's time you had a visit from the Dog Whisperer. If you haven't watched that, you should. Very interesting. It's on the National Geographic channel. He had a dog on that ate a WHOLE couch.
Yummy.
Posted by: Ruth H at October 23, 2006 12:01 PM (xAE2s)
2
Seriously, Ruth, I can't watch The Dog Whisperer without feeling major failings as a pet owner. The vet told me a few weeks ago that my dog is neurotic, which just kills me. I wish I knew what to do about it.
Posted by: Sarah at October 23, 2006 01:04 PM (7Wklx)
3
Thank you Sarah! I don't know why,but I love this
little guy. I think it was a combination of his
taking the oath of citizenship and the picture
of his feet sticking out from beneath your bed.
What can I say? I'm a fan!
Posted by: MaryIndiana at October 24, 2006 07:23 PM (YwdKL)
4
Oh dang it all he' so cute. Just keep on being consistant in your disciple. My fluffball is a good dog but she never or rarely comes when called and has "issues" with some of her bathroom habits. Some things have leveled off over the years and some drive me batty.
Posted by: toni at October 26, 2006 02:48 PM (MNSlE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ABOVE MY PAY GRADE
Yesterday I posted
food for thought. Today I post the other side of the argument:
If we had known then...
If We Knew Then...
You wanna know what I think? I think I'm not smart enough to know.
I too thought of the idea of hindsight when I read Goldberg's article. Tactical mistakes were made during the Civil War and WWII, yet we look back on those two as wild successes. I just don't know how time will look back on Iraq. Someday when all of this is a short paragraph in a high school history textbook, what will that paragraph say?
I don't have all the answers to the War on Terror. I rely on my husband, who's been in two of the three Axis of Evil countries, to give me his informed opinion. I trust our government has far more information than I could ever have about the situation. And I go with my gut and hope that in the end my gut was right.
That doesn't mean I don't have doubts. I constantly refer to the Seven Signs of Non-Competitive States. I think that has a major bearing on whether democracy can work in the Middle East. Reading LGF does nothing to bolster my confidence. But despite my doubts, I still think that Saddam Hussein had to go.
I've just been feeling lately that I shouldn't talk above my pay grade. And isn't that mostly what blogging is? I don't have any delightful insight that you people need to read. Sure, I have an opinion on the CNN sniper video and Ted Kennedy offering to help the Soviets. But my opinion is nothing you can't read at Blackfive or Cold Fury, respectively. I think the New York Times is crap for their recent whoopsie, I think it's ridiculous to assume there's institutionalized racism at Cracker Barrel, and I think we need to have a serious investigation into Dirt-gate.
But what do I know anyway...
Posted by: Sarah at
03:32 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 335 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Maybe you aren't smart enough, maybe you are. Who is to tell? What makes you think that the people making policy decisions are any smarter than you are? They may have different information, they may have access to better information than you. They may have different experiences or skillsets or talents, but don't sell yourself short in this fashion. After all, our collective ignorance blunders on despite our individual shortcomings, and we tend to work things out regardless of the obstacles that seem to loom so large.
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 23, 2006 05:28 AM (Qlh7l)
2
Funny that you should refer to Peters' "Seven Signs of Non-Competitive States." Every one of the indicators he mentions now applies to the United States under the Bushista NeoCon regime. Perhaps you were operating at a several pay grades higher than you lay claim to when you wrote today's blog without even knowing it.
Posted by: PrahaPartizan at October 23, 2006 05:30 AM (hGxBy)
3
Where you come up with that assessment, PrahaPartizan, is beyond my comprehension.
Posted by: Sarah at October 23, 2006 05:59 AM (7Wklx)
4
I like that. "Bushista NeoCon regime". Where did this idea that you could label something and make it so by pointing to the label? Chomsky?
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 23, 2006 07:57 AM (Qlh7l)
5
Sarah,
It sounds like you're retiring from political discourse. Or maybe you're just in a funk today. But if you really want people to just read stuff at Blackfive or Cold Fury instead, don't use the excuse that you're not smart enough to know. Since when did a PhD impress Americans? Hopefully never. All you need is plain common sense here. Also, what's this pay-grade nonsense about? A lot of certified idiots make millions of dollars, and a lot of geniuses fade into obscurity, sometimes self-imposing it. So stop with the "talking at your pay grade" business. I think you should say whatever you want. I would defend your right to do so. Bush probably wouldn't, but I would.
Now, Jacoby on the other hand.. I find it interesting that in all of Jeff Jacoby's trumpeting of past American wars, he forgets one very important one - Vietnam. Or maybe he doesn't forget at all.. Maybe he'd just rather talk about the Ardennes offensive in 1944 because everybody likes World War 2! Right on! We riotously KICKED ASS! Yeah! Well of course we did. But, oh yeah, Vietnam... hmmm... better not talk about that one... it was one of those wars we fought AFTER are leaders became imperialists, and that has no relevance to the current war.. well, not as much as the Battle of the Bulge in 1944 does, right?
Even today, you guys still don't get why Iraq is a mistake. It's not a mistake because we're doing "badly" militarily. If we were fighting a riotous war, we could take 50000 deaths a day and we'd still fight on until the last able-bodied American was dead. Iraq is a mistake because it's not riotous. What we're doing there is for the personal gain of a few, not the many. This ain't 1812 or 1944 or 1991 even. We're on the wrong side of history guys, so let's stop fucking arguing about it and do something to improve ourselves.
Lastly, about the Seven Factors: You can easily find ways in which America, especially conservative America, fails at each of these factors. However, I don't feel that America is a non-competitive state. This leads me to believe that the 7 factors can be applied to any country you want to justify yourself.
Posted by: Will at October 23, 2006 11:23 AM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2006
LIFE IMITATES ART
Woah. It's a real-life
John Doe! I wonder if this guy knows how many dimples there are in a golf ball...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:14 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://anticollective.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-i-saved-world.html
Posted by: I at November 03, 2006 04:30 AM (Z9Jj/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
A thread worth reading:
Iraq Was a Worthy Mistake
Ace's response to Goldberg
The comments are worth a glance too.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:31 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Good articles, Sarah.
Now, knowing that I'll probably get a smart-ass comment from Will, I am hesitant to say this, but I've started feeling a shift in my attitude towards the war in Iraq. I'm not necessarily against it, but I feel like maybe we were too hasty in going in the first place. But maybe I feel like that because I'm constantly bombarded by anti-everything-hippies here in the great Northwest. I don't know. Maybe it's because I think we may have bitten off more than we can chew. Regardless, we're there now. I still stand by the fact that it would be an even bigger mistake to leave than it would be to finish what we started.
Posted by: Erin at October 22, 2006 09:54 AM (023Of)
2
I'm just happy that people are coming around on the issue, even if it's in such a back-handed way. It's taken far too long. In 2003, something like 65% of Americans (probably most of them conservatives) thought Saddam perpetrated 9/11. Almost everyone thought he had WMDs. And a lot of people, at least all the neocons, actually thought that an occupying army led by George W. Bush would be perceived as a liberating force. Come ON PEOPLE! There's no way Bush can promote a "liberal society in the heart of the Arab and Muslim world" when he can't even promote a liberal society back home. (widespread civilian phone surveillance, patriot act, military tribunals, torture, rendition, using homophobia as a voting tactic, erasing the seperation of church and state, consolidating all power into the executive branch, etc, etc, etc, etc, I'm so sick of it all.)
Anyway, what we need to do now is get out of Iraq (not that we're going to be able to - Goldberg's "vote" idea is stupid beyond comprehension) and we need to get back into Afghanistan in a big way. The taliban is far from dead, and it's imperative that we make them dead, now. Too many troops, especially Canadian soldiers who are footing the bill right now, are dying in our justified and unfinished war against terrorists in Afghanistan. Rumsfield left the CIA (the ones calling in the airstrikes in Tora Bora) out to dry in the fall of 2001, because he only cared about occupying Iraq - we have to fire that son of a bitch first, and get the military back from the crazy PNACs.
Lastly, I just want to say that the Pacific Northwest is the greatest place in the world - it's like living on the moon of Endor, surrounded by left-leaning ewoks.
Posted by: Will at October 22, 2006 11:02 AM (QRBGL)
3
Do the smelly hippies get any credit for knowing three and a half years ago what the good and wise Republicans are finding out just now? Well, of course not. Bush wasn't a conservative anyway. He was an imposter,a liberal Manchurian canditate. Conservatisim can't fail, it can only be failed.
No matter what happens in November conservatives are preparing to throw Bush out of the life boat. They have to pretend they never knew him.
Posted by: I'm sorry too at October 22, 2006 04:17 PM (3SfHh)
4
Let's say a president wants to go to war.When considering force requirements, he ignores the advise of the Secretary of the Army, the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Secretary of State, who was a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Shouldn't this man be considered our Churchill? This generation's Truman?
Posted by: I'm sorry too at October 22, 2006 04:39 PM (3SfHh)
Posted by: I'm sorry too at October 23, 2006 04:12 PM (i1pLJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2006
HEH
I just want to be a jerk for a minute and point something out.

Go Cardinals!
UPDATE:
Tigers in three? Not so much.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:19 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
OK I am a Tiger's Fan! But that fat, lard butt, moron is a disgrace to the people of this state! His Tigers hat is as insincere as everything else about this bloated egotistical lump of crap.
Posted by: Jim at October 23, 2006 03:37 PM (IHxDy)
2
Oh ya...Tigers in 6!
Go Tigers!
Posted by: Jim at October 23, 2006 03:40 PM (IHxDy)
3
Sarah, I'm in Cleveland, been having a hard time deciding....this does it..GO CARDS...sorry Detroit.
Posted by: Mary*Ann at October 25, 2006 03:24 AM (bdvqO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
RED, WHITE & AWESOME
Today rivals our 4th of July for Americanness. We voted (absentee), went to the State Fair and ate our weight in okra and deep fried Snickers, and now we're drinking beer and watching the World Series. Take that, Mellencamp: this is our country.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:40 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah, could you possibly enumerate your grievances, with this advertisement. I have seen it and all I get from it, is at least it isn't as odious as that piece of shit Lee Greenwood tune.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at October 22, 2006 04:39 PM (8ruhu)
2
Well, I wrote about it a couple of days ago (on the 16th). I agree with most of what's in the Slate article. I have no beef with the song, but I don't really understand what devastating wildfires and flooding have to do with this being "our country". The only image that really pumps me up is Shepard hitting golf balls on the moon. I think the rest of it highlights shameful moments in US history.
Posted by: Sarah at October 22, 2006 05:41 PM (7Wklx)
3
Saw it again last night, and I think your missing the larger picture. The Katrina/flooding sequence is followed by american people helping their fellow americans(the raising of a frame of a new house), Rosa Parks should be an inspitation to everyone to do the right thing, same for the late Reverand King. The images of the Vietnam protests should serve as a reminder that this democraticc republic requires PARTICIPATION, and hopefully, an informed electorate. At least that is my take on it, as for the yutz writing in Slate, well now you know why I stopped reading both Slate, and Salon, though Salon is usually better written. Seems to me being waaaayyy younger than me you don't have the same frame of reference towards the images as I do.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at October 23, 2006 07:55 PM (8ruhu)
4
Maybe it is an age thing, I don't know. It was said that the commercial shows the US, blemishes and all. But I don't know what that has to do with trying to sell a car. There's a time to reflect on the deep meaning of certain images in history, but I don't think a car commercial is that time. A car commercial should be rah-rah, and the target Chevy audience probably doesn't think hippies and Nixon is a good mental association for a new truck.
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 09:34 AM (7Wklx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2006
LINK
John Hawkins has a
great interview with Larry Elder on race, health care, free trade, and blogging.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:50 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Man, I love Larry Elders.
Posted by: Erin at October 20, 2006 05:07 PM (023Of)
2
There's a lot of constructive and destructive things to say about Larry Elders. Instead I'll just write out dictionary definitions.
Liberal - 1. abundant, ample, 2. giving freely, generous, 3. open minded, 4. not strict or rigorous, 5. for the general broadening of the mind, 6. favouring moderate politcal and social reform.
Conservative - 1. adverse to rapid change, 2. moderate, avoiding extremes, 3. (of an estimate, etc.) purposely low, 4. tending to conserve
Oxford dictionary puts the most important meaning of each word (in modern English) first.
All of this confirms my suspicion that dictionaries are useless.
Posted by: Will at October 20, 2006 06:03 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2006
BREATHE OUT
Whew, my heart can't handle being a baseball fan. I thought for a while that it might be my duty-Judy to be a Tigers fan next week, but now the Tigers can eat it.
All hail Yadier Molina.
And my sleep cycle can't handle Eastern time zone. Look at me, up until midnight. I'm so off schedule from all these late night games that Charlie and I slept until 0945 this morning. I haven't slept that late since college.
And I sure can't sleep right now; I have to wait for all those butterflies to calm down.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:49 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
WHOOO HOOO! The Cards go to the World Series!!! I couldn't be more excited too!
Posted by: Angie at October 20, 2006 05:27 AM (ec43W)
2
Great game last night! Definitely ran late on the East Coast. It's rough when you have to get up only a few hours later. Should be a great World Series.
Posted by: NewEngland SportsGuy at October 20, 2006 02:27 PM (9Shuz)
3
Tigers in five, the basrball realist in me says Detroit just has too much pitching.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at October 20, 2006 07:18 PM (8ruhu)
4
Tigers in five, four if Carpenter doesn't win. Cardinals didn't win, the Mets choked. A decent girls softball team could hit the Cardinals pitching. The Tigers will tear them up. And yes, I am a bitter Cubs fan. Go Tigers!!!
Posted by: monty at October 21, 2006 06:49 AM (AsKbT)
5
I became a Detroit fan after the 9th inning, bases jammed, 1 out, down by 2 Mets choking.
Posted by: Sgt Hook at October 21, 2006 03:34 PM (ZkBlA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2006
HEH
Iowahawk makes an
appeal to Conservative America. I got such a kick out of this paragraph that I can't stop giggling. Republican stereotypes crack me up.
Despite what you may have heard on Fox News, we Democrats know what issues are on the minds of heartland conservatives like you. We know that your number one concern of is the safety of your children -- whether they are plucking their banjos on the back porch, speaking tongues to snakes at Jesus Camp, or torching crosses at your local Nascar racing contest. We also know that the number one threat to your children's safety is the scourge of international homo-ism. That's why we at the DNC have created "The Contract With American Hillbillies," a new multipoint investigation program to identify and root out conservative stealth homoism before it threatens you or your precious little inbreeds.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:26 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I sent the link in an IM to my husband and that's the quote I sent (the last sentence anyhow)... my favorite paragraph. Too, too funny.
Posted by: Synova at October 19, 2006 07:43 AM (8HO37)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 17, 2006
FAILING CIVICS
Saw this on MSNBC today:
A new study finds that even top undergraduates are woefully ignorant of history and civic government
I can't say I'm surprised at all. My college GPA was a 3.92 and I missed a couple on the sample test. Embarrassing. And my college did a pretty good job of forcing us to take a variety of courses. Still, even with all those requirements I never had to take economics, statistics, or anything like geography. I think we do a disservice to students by filling their schedules with stuff like "Environmental Global Warming" or "Gender and the Law". I took a class on serial killers, so now I know more than the average person about Ted Bundy but cringed when I got asked a question about the Revolutionary War. That's sad, but I have no one to blame but myself. I just wasn't mature enough from age 18 to 22 to take anything that wasn't fun. Fat lot of good my Russian literature and Japanese classes have done me since.
By the way, I've been looking for a good US history book because I think I could really use a refresher. Anyone out there have any suggestions?
Posted by: Sarah at
04:18 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just took the sample test, got all eight correct. I will admit that until the last presidential election cycle I would have gotten a couple wrong too Sarah.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at October 17, 2006 05:52 PM (8ruhu)
2
I've been reading on and off for 2 years (because I've reading more than one book at a time) "A Patriot's History of the United States" By Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen. Stay away from Howard Zinn's alternative, A People's History of the US.
Posted by: Chuck at October 17, 2006 06:09 PM (EWQt0)
3
Howard Zin _The People's History_. Just thumb through it Sarah. Just thumb through it.
Posted by: Bob at October 17, 2006 06:16 PM (6PBwP)
4
Just find a book with dates and names. The rest is bias.
Posted by: Will at October 17, 2006 07:22 PM (QRBGL)
5
I also missed 2 of them, but thats because i miss read the answer on one of them, but it would still be wrong on a real test. seeing that only 50% got most of them right, was rather scary.
Posted by: dagamore at October 17, 2006 11:41 PM (7IZfE)
6
I think that Ken Davis (author of books that start with "Don't Know Much About..") Has a book on US history. I know I read one a few years back on geography and if I recall correctly, it was a good overview...
Posted by: jck at October 18, 2006 03:00 AM (fRt6P)
Posted by: Dave at October 18, 2006 04:33 AM (6GFTi)
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 18, 2006 06:03 AM (Qlh7l)
9
How's this for failure? I've turned off all the blockers and I still can't figure out how to get to the fricking test. I just get the photo and a link that takes me back to the photo.
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 18, 2006 08:46 PM (8kqyx)
10
Not a book but a site http://home.wi.rr.com/rickgardiner/primarysources.htm
I love spending time there you will too!
Posted by: gopop at October 21, 2006 06:05 PM (54sg9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SHEESH
Good thing we didn't
bet on black.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:40 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Scene from Passenger 57:
Snipes: "Do you ever play roulette?"
Bad Guy: "Nope."
Snipes: "Oh, well, do you ever play chess?"
Bad Guy: "Not really."
Snipes: "Parcheesi?"
Bad Guy: "Oh, yes, I quite enjoy that."
Snipes: "Well, let me give you a little advice: ALWAYS BET ON BLACK!"
Bad Guy: "What?"
Snipes: "I'm black."
Bad Guy: "Oh.. alright."
Posted by: Will at October 17, 2006 11:00 AM (QRBGL)
2
Thanks, Will. I was REALLY scratching my head on that post. Passenger 57 clearly did not make the same impression on me as on Sarah.

Or else early dementia is kicking in.
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 17, 2006 08:51 PM (945XX)
3
Sorry, that's like my husband's favorite ridiculous movie line. He says it all the time. My favorite is "That's none of your damn business, and I'll thank you to stay out of my personal affairs" from Ace Ventura.
Posted by: Sarah at October 18, 2006 03:11 AM (7Wklx)
4
Very nice site http://megamozg.com/master-degree/map.html
Posted by: Dale at November 04, 2006 01:55 PM (yu/yc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
102kb generated in CPU 0.0681, elapsed 0.2079 seconds.
65 queries taking 0.1809 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.